<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://odograph.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://odograph.com/?p=611</link>
	<description>Odograph - n. an instrument recording distance traveled, especially by a pedestrian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 22:40:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: odograph</title>
		<link>http://odograph.com/?p=611&#038;cpage=1#comment-97768</link>
		<dc:creator>odograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odograph.com/?p=611#comment-97768</guid>
		<description>After giving us $100,000?

Trying to follow ... I see that per capita federal expenditures are running upwards of seven grand:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://trac.syr.edu/tracreports/fedfund/112/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TRAC Report&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After giving us $100,000?</p>
<p>Trying to follow &#8230; I see that per capita federal expenditures are running upwards of seven grand:</p>
<p><a href="http://trac.syr.edu/tracreports/fedfund/112/" rel="nofollow">TRAC Report</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. R. L. Cowan</title>
		<link>http://odograph.com/?p=611&#038;cpage=1#comment-97350</link>
		<dc:creator>G. R. L. Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 15:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odograph.com/?p=611#comment-97350</guid>
		<description>Much as we all may like to think of ourselves as taxpayers, if the tax man takes from us $30,000 after &lt;em&gt;giving&lt;/em&gt; us &lt;em&gt;$100,000&lt;/em&gt;, we&#039;re not. We are, in that event, tax &lt;em&gt;takers&lt;/em&gt;.

As such we must anticipate that revenue-neutrality will sell best, to the tax-paying majority of which we are not members, if the tax reductions &lt;em&gt;precede&lt;/em&gt; the tax increases by several months at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much as we all may like to think of ourselves as taxpayers, if the tax man takes from us $30,000 after <em>giving</em> us <em>$100,000</em>, we&#8217;re not. We are, in that event, tax <em>takers</em>.</p>
<p>As such we must anticipate that revenue-neutrality will sell best, to the tax-paying majority of which we are not members, if the tax reductions <em>precede</em> the tax increases by several months at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Rapier</title>
		<link>http://odograph.com/?p=611&#038;cpage=1#comment-97085</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Rapier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 03:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://odograph.com/?p=611#comment-97085</guid>
		<description>Agree completely with the carbon tax. I think it is the single most important thing we could do to spur conservation. It would have a faster response than increasing CAFE standards (which should be done as well) and it would punish processes that merely recycle fossil fuels into &quot;green&quot; fuels. If you only gave me 1 change that I could make in order to spur us toward energy independence, a carbon tax would be my choice.

RR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree completely with the carbon tax. I think it is the single most important thing we could do to spur conservation. It would have a faster response than increasing CAFE standards (which should be done as well) and it would punish processes that merely recycle fossil fuels into &#8220;green&#8221; fuels. If you only gave me 1 change that I could make in order to spur us toward energy independence, a carbon tax would be my choice.</p>
<p>RR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
